Yankees: 4 things the Bombers can learn from small-market teams
Despite spending a substantial amount of money on players’ salaries over the years, the Yankees have not reached the World Series since 2009, and they may not make the playoffs this year despite spending just over $200 million on player salaries.
Let’s hope they do.
However, some savvy smaller-market teams have spent much less money on acquiring talented players than the Bronx Bombers and have played better than the men in pinstripes in recent history. Maybe the Yanks can learn something from them?
The Yankees’ struggles of late, not surprisingly, have led to a greater focus on how much money they spend and how they spend their funds.
For instance, YGY’s Thomas Carannante writes that the Bombers can and should spend more money this year on player acquisitions if they hope to make it to the playoffs in 2021. He argues that the club’s supposed payroll restrictions are arbitrary, do not reflect their significant financial resources, and likely reflect a desire by management to contain costs and increase profits. The fans’ strong desire to see more success on the ball field, as a consequence, is being pushed aside.
The data bears this out. In March 2021, Forbes reported that the Yankees remain MLB’s most valuable team for the 23rd consecutive year with a valuation of $5.25 billion. Sportico, a professional sports business publication, valued the 2021 club even higher at $6.75 billion.
The organization’s multiple and lucrative revenue streams are enormous and dwarf the amounts taken in by other MLB clubs. As a result, the Bombers have a lot of money. However, they are not spending the dollars proportionate to their total income, wealth, and value.
From a different yet related perspective, the Washington Post’s Neil Greenberg analyzed recently how the Yanks have made serious mistakes in the way they have allocated their money on players over the years.
In particular, since 2011, instead of identifying and pursuing up-and-coming talent, the club has consistently apportioned an enormous amount on veteran player salaries, many of whom are past their prime. The bottom line is that the boys from the Bronx have not been getting a bang for their buck.
Greenberg argues that the Yanks need to critically rethink how they target their funds and the amount of money they spend on free agents. In addition, the Yankees organization should reconsider its strategy of primarily acquiring older players and viewing young players from their farm system as occasional fill-ins. The overall quality of the club’s players in the minor leagues is currently mixed, with few bonafide stars ready to be promoted to the majors.
A great starting point to begin formulating a more fruitful payroll allocation plan is to look closely at how successful small-market teams acquire and develop excellent players for a modest cost.
Since these teams have significantly limited financial resources, they have much less of a margin for error in deciding whom to add to the team if they hope to be successful. As a result, these teams tend to contribute a higher percentage of their funds to developing young players and a much smaller portion of their budget to acquiring veteran players with high salary, multi-year contracts.
Among the clubs in small markets, the Tampa Bay Rays and the Oakland Athletics are two examples of teams with limited budgets that have done an excellent job on player selection and development over time. As a result, both clubs have won a high percentage of their games during the regular season, and they have frequently made it to the playoffs. The Milwaukee Brewers also have been able to acquire and cultivate talented players at a modest cost.
These three innovative and successful teams have formulated and implemented an astute player evaluation and development system and business model to construct their rosters.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not arguing that the Yanks should spend less money. In fact, I strongly agree that they have the financial resources to spend significantly more money than they have been allotting. The economic data support this position. It is how the organization has been spending its money that I have issues with.
Along with spending more money, there are four strategies that the Yanks should pursue that will permit them to get more bang for their buck.
4. Make Expensive Managerial Change
As we all have painfully witnessed, problems resulting from Aaron Boone’s lack of experience have surfaced several times during the 2021 season. First and foremost, the Yanks must use their money to hire someone who has managed a successful small (or medium-sized) market team with considerably fewer resources at their club’s disposal.
Kevin Cash (Tampa Bay Rays), Craig Counsell (Milwaukee Brewers), and Bob Melvin (Oakland Athletics) are examples of experienced and proven winners, and either one of the three would be a great future manager for the Yanks.
The Yanks should make a strong effort to hire one of these three when he becomes available and spend the necessary money to do so. As a result of recent contract extensions, Melvin, Counsell, and Cash won’t be available until 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively.
Boone has done a solid amount with “more,” but imagine having a well-respected manager at the helm who has repeatedly done more with less? This is the same reason fans are extremely confident about Chaim Bloom running the Red Sox after helping to build the Rays.
3. Play in Rule 5 Market, Don’t Ignore It
Although difficult, the Bombers should more vigorously pursue Rule 5 players who demonstrate hidden potential instead of pretending their roster is already full. While the Red Sox were perfectly willing to take Garrett Whitlock (and Kaleb Ort at the minor-league level) from the Yankees, the team from the Bronx seemed willing to wait out the entire process, letting talent pass them by.
The team should also remain aggressive in international free agency, where they’ve seemed content to rest on their laurels in recent years. The club should make a more substantial effort to obtain more international free agent money via trades whenever possible.
2. Use Resources for Smart Trades, Not Veteran Signings
The Yanks should make a greater effort to trade for less expensive young players with great potential and avoid taking chances on more costly free agents who already have played several years. Why pay free agents a lot of money over multiple years for their past performance? In the long run, it is more cost effective to obtain younger, less costly players with great potential.
Star players such as Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, Derek Jeter, Don Mattingly, Mickey Mantle, Mariano Rivera, Aaron Judge, and others serve as excellent examples of what the team can achieve by developing their own players in-house.
Of course, in those rare instances when someone like a Reggie Jackson or a Gerrit Cole enters the free agency market, the Yankees must take out their wallet, outbid other teams, and sign him for an extended period.
Thus, the strategy is to plan for the long run by simultaneously acquiring outstanding young players from teams in constant flux and signing an extraordinary free agent when clearly warranted. Over time, the team’s money can then be used to retain the best young players and pay for the new star free agents.
Sadly, the club has spent too much money on veteran free agents who haven’t performed well and are injury-prone. Those who are not performing well or are often injured should be traded (if possible) to acquire young, promising players. At the same time, the Yanks have not done a great job identifying and acquiring truly outstanding young talent.
1. Spend on Scouting/Talent Evaluation
The Bombers need much better scouts and evaluators of talent than they currently have on their payroll. Too many great players have been overlooked and have been snatched up by other teams, and too many subpar players have been signed over the years just before they’ve cratered. Player evaluation is both a science and an art. Superb, experienced and successful scouts and evaluators are worth their weight in gold.
In a nutshell, the Yankees appear to be following a roster formation strategy from the last century, and it is not working. Given the tremendous amount of money the team already spends on players’ salaries (and how much more they could comfortably spend), the Yanks should be far more successful than they have been.
And, when it’s come time to choose pieces to protect (Whitlock, Ort) or pit players against each other in trade (Brandon Drury over Nick Solak? Taylor Widener?), the Yankees always seem to choose incorrectly.
However, baseball has changed a lot over time and continues to change, and the team now needs to reconsider its business model and player evaluation and development culture if they wish to succeed in the coming years.