Skip to main content

Yankees' trade deadline report on last viable catching target will blow your mind

You've got to be kidding!
Apr 18, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Cincinnati Reds catcher Tyler Stephenson (37) looks to the dougout before a pitch against the Minnesota Twins in the seventh inning at Target Field. Mandatory Credit: Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
Apr 18, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Cincinnati Reds catcher Tyler Stephenson (37) looks to the dougout before a pitch against the Minnesota Twins in the seventh inning at Target Field. Mandatory Credit: Matt Blewett-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Let's take a minute to survey what the catching market really looked like at the 2026 trade deadline. Shea Langeliers got hurt, taking one option off the board. The Minnesota Twins took Ryan Jeffers off the board. Hunter Goodman was always a pipedream. Where could Brian Cashman and the New York Yankees reasonably turn?

Well, the next high-end option was Adley Rutschman, but the dearth of options made him prohibitively expensive. So, Cashman's off the hook, right? Wrong.

While he might not have been in the same tier as the others listed above, Cincinnati Reds catcher Tyler Stephenson would've been an upgrade over Austin Wells and an acceptable fallback option. Even better, as a rental, he would have been relatively affordable. Yet, the Reds, a team going nowhere, didn't trade him.

That might make you think the asking price was too high, but we don't know that for sure because, inexplicably, New York was never in on Stephenson. Shocking, but true.

Cashman said that there was no opportunity that there was no opportunity they felt good enough about to push through on, but how can that actually be true if you never had serious conversations about one of the best backstops that was actually available?

Stephenson isn't a star, but he is a solid player. He's hitting .252/.338/.411 with nine homers on the season. He has some very good underlying metrics, like a 92nd percentile chase rate and an 82nd percentile average exit velocity. He has also been on an extended tear, hitting .310/.382/.504 since June 1.

Defensively, the 30-year-old is below average in some regards. He posts slow pop times and has a below-average arm. He's also a poor pitch framer. However, he's a 97th-percentile pitch blocker, and he's won the most ABS challenges among all catchers with 72. He's not just a high-volume challenger, either, as he's successful 72% of the time. For reference, Austin Wells has won 54 challenges and has a 63% success rate.

Looks like he would have been a nice addition, and of course, would have been an upgrade over Wells and Ali Sanchez. But a common Cashman tendency may have stood in the way.

Brian Cashman's aversion to rentals cost the Yankees their last chance to upgrade catcher with Tyler Stephenson

A look back through the years and it becomes clear that Cashman rarely targets rentals at the trade deadline. Instead, he prefers to treat it as some sort of offseason appetizer, acquiring players who can also help the following season and possibly beyond.

This isn't inherently bad, but there are some additional factors to consider when you primarily go after players who are still under team control.

The first thing is that control, especially if they're in their arbitration years, is valuable. Price tags rise as a result. And Cashman is generally unwilling to part with his top prospects, preferring to deal guys ranked 10th and lower in the system.

That means you're getting the Camilo Dovals and Jake Birds of the world, instead of Mason Miller as we saw at last year's deadline. Of course, to be fair, that strategy also gave us David Bednar.

With that said, veteran rentals present another benefit. They come with a built-in escape hatch. If a rental acquired at the trade deadline doesn't work out, the team can simply cut bait and move on in the offseason. That's important because roster spots have value and flexibility can be key. The Yankees did nothing to upgrade their bullpen over the winter because doing so would've meant admitting defeat on Doval and Bird, for example.

Rentals are cheaper to acquire, too. It's the reason why Tarik Skubal went for a seemingly light package, whereas a guy like Paul Skenes would have cost the entire farm system at last year's deadline. If you're paying lower prices without sacrificing talent, you can spread the wealth and bring home more upgrades than if you're paying a premium for control.

Ultimately, marrying these two strategies is important. You can't go too far in one direction or the other, or else you miss opportunities on either side. That's what Stephenson represents. A missed opportunity, and one that might prove to haunt the Yankees' 2026 season.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations