Yankees: 3 players who were extremely affected by changing baseball

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 02: Brett Gardner #11 of the New York Yankees in action against the Detroit Tigers at Yankee Stadium on May 02, 2021 in New York City. New York Yankees defeated the Detroit Tigers 2-0. (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 02: Brett Gardner #11 of the New York Yankees in action against the Detroit Tigers at Yankee Stadium on May 02, 2021 in New York City. New York Yankees defeated the Detroit Tigers 2-0. (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)
1 of 3
Next

The New York Yankees’ offense, supposedly their calling card entering the 2021 season, has looked both frustrating and bare-minimum satisfying throughout the campaign.

At this point, the Bombers have dug out of a 6-11 hole to sit at 18-16, putting just enough pressure on bullpens like the Astros and Nationals to break through close games right before the proverbial buzzer had sounded.

It sounds gauche to complain about a winning team amid a fairly substantial run, but, well … the same issues that have plagued the Yankees for years are still present, and they’ve been magnified, considering the team doesn’t hit quite as many home runs as they used to.

Well … about that …

After years of MLB denying that they’d tightened the seams on their balls (among other things) to make the 2019 version fly further and easier than the previous vintage, the league outright admitted the difference this offseason, choosing to change the balls’ construction yet again in an effort to make things “fair.” When they did this, however, they squeezed a good degree of the offense left in the game back out again.

The Yankees’ team offense, which looks bleak every which way in triple slashes, is actually slightly above MLB average, even with all sorts of unsightly and powerless lines mixed in.

That’s not fair to anyone.

Based on what we’ve seen so far in 2021, what we watched take place in 2019, and the experiences of a few people who, ahem, aren’t here anymore, it’s clear the changing baseball has completely altered the career paths of a few beloved Yankees.

Some Bombers are currently stuck in the doldrums, hoping the change isn’t permanent.

These 3 Yankees were most affected by the changing baseball in 2019 and 2021.

Brett Gardner #11 of the New York Yankees (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)
Brett Gardner #11 of the New York Yankees (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images) /

3. Brett Gardner

Veteran fourth outfielder Brett Gardner has a semi-permanent contract with the Yankees for leadership purposes until he desires a change to that routine.

Unfortunately, he doesn’t seem likely to be nearly as productive as he was in 2019 … well, ever again, thanks in part to the shifting mechanics of the equipment, as well as his aging curve.

Much of the justification for Gardner’s ability to leave the Yankees on his terms comes from the ’19 campaign in which he turned back the clock (side note: can you “turn back the clock” to something that was never really there before?) with a remarkable and uncharacteristic 28 home runs in 141 games, a career high by a wide margin.

Always known as an above-average defender, solid OBP guy, and above-average hitter (in terms of OPS+) about half the time, Gardner leveled up in 2019, only to watch a difficult August and slow start color his numbers in 2020. He batted just .223 in the shortened season, but with a .354 OBP, and found himself starting playoff games thanks to a potent close to the campaign.

2021, though, has been a different story, as Gardner has been one of many powerless Yankees, still sporting a 0 in the home run column and only recently inching his average back to .200. The most emblematic swing of his power drought is the one pictured in the featured image, a rip to right against Jose Ureña that went for a sac fly to the wall instead of a porch shot like viewers have become accustomed to.

Gardner remains a serviceable part-time player, even in his later years, but his reputation has definitely been temporarily inflated thanks to the 2019 juiced ball.

Gleyber Torres #25 of the New York Yankees (Photo by Steven Ryan/Getty Images)
Gleyber Torres #25 of the New York Yankees (Photo by Steven Ryan/Getty Images) /

2. Gleyber Torres

Players who had age-22 seasons like Gleyber Torres aren’t really supposed to slide backwards in two years’ time, but here we are.

Torres’ bat is beginning to come around, with his first home run of the 2021 season finally leaving the yard on Sunday afternoon, taking with it the monkey that lived upon his back. So far in ’21, though, his climb back to relevancy has been predicated on shortening his swing, line-drive singles and loopers. The extremely skilled Torres has been able to maximize his heroics by batting .296 with runners in scoring position and adjusting to hit ’em where they ain’t, but he hasn’t looked the part of a middle infielder who can pop 38 homers out over a 162-game slate.

Thanks, new dead baseball!

In an extremely strange turn of events, the much-maligned Torres has been an above-average defender in 2021 at shortstop according to all advanced metrics, and has raised his average to .242 while thriving at driving in runs in “clutch” scenarios. The homers, though, have disappeared, and there’s an obvious culprit behind his changing profile.

Hitters aren’t supposed to lose their most marketable skill as they mature, especially between the ages of 22 and 24.

Though the Yankees’ offense on the whole has somehow been above average in 2021, which is an embarrassing indictment on what is now average, Torres remains below even the new, lowered threshold. His 88 OPS+ indicates his overall output is 12 points below league average, and figuring out a way to not only pass 100 but vault over it could determine whether he’s the future shortstop of the Yankees.

Yes, it’s really that dire.

Masahiro Tanaka of the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles (Photo by Jun Sato/Getty Images)
Masahiro Tanaka of the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles (Photo by Jun Sato/Getty Images) /

1. Masahiro Tanaka

Yes, the changing baseball may very much be a major reason behind Masahiro Tanaka’s departure from MLB at the age of 32.

After opening his career stateside with ERA+ of 138, 116, and 140 (in the Yankees’ forgotten 2016 season, Tanaka was brilliant), he hit a rough patch during the 2017 regular season, allowing 35 home runs in 178.1 innings pitched. In the postseason, though, he miraculously settled down, shutting out the Indians and allowing two earned runs in 13 innings against the Astros, creating the myth of “Playoff Tanaka.”

Could the many fluctuations of his last four seasons be due in large part to the changing baseball? It’s quite possible! Pitchers grew suspicious of the ball’s composition in 2017, and researchers eventually determined it was more aerodynamic, yet they couldn’t discern why. In 2018, Tanaka got his numbers back above league average (112 ERA+, 3.75 ERA), but then changes came again for the ball in 2019, when Tanaka had the second-worst season of his career, posting a 4.45 ERA and allowing a number of gopher balls, altering his reputation.

You can legitimately track Tanaka’s fluctuations and inability to tame his famous splitter with the introduction and removal of new baseballs. Famously, too, MLB took its live balls out of play during the 2019 postseason … when Tanaka shut the Astros out on the road in Game 1 of the ALCS, looking as good as he had all season. Who’s to say MLB didn’t make the same swap in the 2017 postseason?

Sad to say, but MLB’s constant experimenting with the baseballs deeply affected a feel pitcher like Tanaka, who is no longer stateside in part because the league determined he was regressing. Perhaps, but perhaps not. He might be dominating and soaking up innings with the new, dead baseballs. Probably would be.

Next