3 relievers Yankees can trade for after Adam Ottavino deal

CINCINNATI, OH - SEPTEMBER 21: Amir Garrett #50 of the Cincinnati Reds reacts during a game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Great American Ball Park on September 21, 2020 in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Reds won 6-3. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)
CINCINNATI, OH - SEPTEMBER 21: Amir Garrett #50 of the Cincinnati Reds reacts during a game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Great American Ball Park on September 21, 2020 in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Reds won 6-3. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)
1 of 3
Next

The Yankees still have some 40-man roster space to clear and $10 million to work with. They’re ready to get a reliever. What about via trade?

The New York Yankees jettisoned Adam Ottavino in a pure salary dump this week, placing the player who’d previously been among their best relievers in 2019 directly onto the roster of a division rival — well, after he’d fallen hard off the trust tree in the ’19 postseason.

So, what’s next? Well, the pennies saved won’t go untouched — the Yankees are likely to use up the $10 million to absorb the final year (?) of Brett Gardner’s career, as well as acquire a reliever to take Ottavino’s place.

Based on the way the slider-dependent righty pitched in 2020, there probably are legitimate avenues to improve upon that short-relief spot, though the method of Otto’s departure to Boston does remain unsavory.

If the Yankees want to sign a reliever, there are plenty available, from old friends Shane Greene and David Robertson to Trevor Rosenthal and Alex Colome.

But it could be even cheaper to swing another deal for a controllable young arm, too — especially since there are still some 40-man roster spots that could use clearing.

Without Ottavino, and adding Corey Kluber, Jameson Taillon, and DJ LeMahieu, the Yankees’ roster is now completely filled up again. These trades could clear out more 40-man fluff and give the Yanks the ‘pen threat they definitely need.

Amir Garrett #50 of the Cincinnati Reds
Amir Garrett #50 of the Cincinnati Reds /

3. Amir Garrett

Amir Garrett’s ‘tude would fit perfectly on the Yankees.

Ignore the obvious ways in which Amir Garrett, a hard-throwing lefty, fills a clear bullpen need for the Yankees. Focus, for a second, on the culture fit.

Garrett would bring the type of edge and killer instinct the team lacked last season following CC Sabathia’s retirement, and he’d be available several times a week to bore in on lefty batters. He played basketball at St. John’s. He’s got New York toughness. He’d be a dream.

And oh yeah, he’s a pretty impressive pitcher, too.

Garrett comes with three years of control attached to his name, and only costs $1.5 million for the 2021 season, assuming it’s played in full. In the shortened 2020 campaign, he continued his breakout, whiffing 26 men in 18.1 innings pitched. His most recent full season consisted of a remarkable 78 Ks in 56 innings pitched, alongside a 3.21 ERA. Garrett isn’t just good; he’s great, and he’s peaking.

The Reds haven’t had substantive talks with the Yankees this offseason despite reports of a sell-off — no, not even for Luis Castillo — and Sonny Gray and Eugenio Suarez don’t exactly stand out as perfect trade targets. But if the Bombers haven’t engaged Cincy and dangled a 40-man player or two for Garrett, they’re not doing their due diligence.

Pitcher Mychal Givens #60 of the Colorado Rockies
Pitcher Mychal Givens #60 of the Colorado Rockies /

2. Mychal Givens

Could the Yankees plunder a former divisional foe like Mychal Givens?

Why on earth did the Rockies trade for Orioles frisbee-hurling righty Mychal Givens during the middle of the 2020 pandemic season?

Why … why did that happen?

Givens is the most expensive option on the table here, in terms of cash on the nail, but he’s only due just over $4 million for 2021, his final campaign before free agency. The Yankees are unlikely to secure a free agent option for lower than that total, so why not include Givens, who they’re uniquely familiar with?

From what we’ve seen of the somewhat inconsistent slider-dominant arm over the years in Baltimore, he’s, well … he’s a lot like a half-price Ottavino. Givens was outright special in Baltimore last summer (13 innings, 1.38 ERA) before falling to earth at a mile high in Denver, posting a 6.75 mark. Most years, you can find Givens at over a strikeout per inning and somewhere between 3.50 and 3.75 in 70-ish innings pitched. That’ll play in the seventh inning, and the Yankees might not even need him much after the sixth.

The Rockies are poised to be wheelers and/or dealers this offseason, if they know what’s good for them, and Givens feels like a piece they picked up by accident last year and forgot to drop early in the offseason. Maybe it’s time for the Yanks to pry.

Josh Staumont #63 of the Kansas City Royals (Photo by Brace Hemmelgarn/Minnesota Twins/Getty Images)
Josh Staumont #63 of the Kansas City Royals (Photo by Brace Hemmelgarn/Minnesota Twins/Getty Images) /

1. Josh Staumont

Why don’t the Yankees just nab the highest-upside option in Josh Staumont?

27-year-old Josh Staumont is entering his prime in Kansas City with only two big-league seasons under his belt.

Therefore, anyone who trades for him will have to convince KC that Staumont either won’t be a part of the next, great Royals team — or they’ll have to slightly overpay. He’s locked down under team control through 2025, and won’t even be arbitration eligible until 2023. Sad for Staumont, but it’s quite possible that, because of his unfortunate timeline, he’ll only cash in on one impactful contract if he keeps this up.

In case you missed Staumont’s work on a middling Royals team with plenty else going on during 2020, the stats speak for themselves here. 25.2 innings pitched, 37 Ks, 2.45 ERA and a wicked hammer.

Instead of spare parts, it might take a top-10 prospect to add Staumont (Alexander Vizcaino?), in addition to a player like, say, Miguel Andujar. The Royals are looking for offense and lottery tickets, and seem to think they can compete sooner rather than later in the AL Central — and, watching Cleveland take purposeful steps backward, they might not be wrong.

The Royals (and Tigers, for that matter) will be hungry soon enough to attack the White Sox and Twins, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be enticed to give up on fungible relievers in the meantime. Staumont, ridiculously cheap and insanely effective, should be the Yankees’ Plan A.

Next