Yankees: Performance enhancing drugs, and the baseball hall of shame

Voting for modern-era candidates for induction into the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum by members of the Baseball Writers Association of America is underway. Final results will be announced on January 22, 2019. The controversy concerning drug use in the sport continues and will likely determine whether two particular New York Yankees are elected to Cooperstown.

As my previous article discussed, the drug-use issue will likely decide whether former starting pitchers and former Yankees Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte are elected to the Hall of Fame (HOF). Both are on the 2019 ballot.

Thus, this is an appropriate time to analyze this controversy and how the debate over drug use affects Yankee players in terms of their inclusion in the HOF. In the end, I will answer the question whether former Yankees and other players who have performed extremely well throughout their career but have used PEDs should be included in the Hall.

The list of banned PEDs by MLB includes steroids (such as the anabolic steroid testosterone), related hormones, amphetamines, masking agents, and diuretics. They provide an advantage to players on the diamond in various ways, including adding muscle mass, strength, and endurance.

According to the Mayo Clinic, however, there are many health risks associated with using PEDs. The major ones pertaining to men’s health include: shrunken testicles, infertility, prostate gland enlargement, liver abnormalities, tumors, high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, heart and blood circulation problems, aggressive behaviors (such as rage or violence), psychiatric disorders (such as depression), infections or diseases such as HIV or hepatitis from injecting drugs, and risk of future development problems in teenagers.

Since the late 1800s ballplayers have been known to try to gain chemical advantages. In 1889 Pud Galvin became widely known for his use of Brown-Sequard Elixir, a testosterone supplement produced from testicles of live animals.

Babe Ruth was thought to once have injected himself with a similar extract from sheep testicles, but it made him ill and he never used it again.

In 1961 Mickey Mantle was believed to have injected himself with a chemical cocktail that included steroids and amphetamines in an effort to keep up with Roger Maris during their famous home run competition.

Former Yanks relief pitcher and HOF member Goose Gossage have admitted to using amphetamines during his playing career (1972-1994), which was illegal at the time.

Finally, Willie Mays was rumored to have used a powerful liquid amphetamine he referred to as “red juice” during his New York Mets days.

Public admissions by Jose Conseco and Mark McGuire of their heavy dependence on steroids at the turn of the 21st Century shined a bright national spotlight on the use of steroids in baseball, leading to questions about the validity of their accomplishments on the field.

In the early 2000s, a federal government investigation of a nutrition center, the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative (BALCO), was found to have distributed anabolic steroids to a number of professional athletes (e.g., Olympic track star Marion Jones), including prominent baseball players such as Barry Bonds and former Yankee Jason Giambi.

As a result, several star players such as Conseco, McGuire, former Yankee Alex Rodriquez, Rafael Palmeiro, and Sammy Sosa were summoned to testify in front of a congressional committee in 2005. The committee was deeply concerned about the accepted use of steroids by baseball players and other elite athletes.

After hearing the testimony of the players, Congressional representatives accused MLB of failing to confront the issue of PEDs and were worried that drug use in baseball created a bad persona of players who in many cases are role models to the nation’s youth. A major fear was that the use of PEDs by MLB players would encourage high school and college students to do the same, with possible long-term, negative health effects as a result.

Bowing to congressional pressure and ensuing negative media coverage, MLB and the MLB Players Association worked closely together to review current drug policy and develop stricter regulations and penalties. They agreed to pursue a zero-tolerance approach involving the use of PEDs in November 2005.

At the same time, baseball commissioner Bud Selig appointed former Senator George J. Mitchell in 2006 to conduct an investigation into steroid use by MLB players. Mitchell’s 311-page report was released on December 13, 2007, and identified more than 80 former and current baseball players, including Bonds. (Despite Bonds’ denials, there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence that he used various types of steroids and human growth hormones during his playing days.) The integrity of America’s national pastime was at stake.

In 2013, not a single player involved with drug use was elected to the HOF. This included marquee players such as McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds, all of whom were appearing on the ballot for the first time. While some HOF voters have been forgiving with the passage of time, a large block has continued to vote to exclude drug users from inclusion in Cooperstown.

At the end of 2017, Cincinnati Reds Hall of Famer and HOF board vice chair Joe Morgan sent out a letter titled, “The Hall of Fame is Special.” In the letter, Morgan strongly urged HOF voters to reject PEDs users.

He wrote, “We hope the day never comes when known steroid users are voted into the Hall of Fame. They cheated. Steroid users don’t belong here.”

Today MLB players are tested at least twice a year, including some randomly during the offseason. Urine tests are used to catch offenders of drug use rules. A large number of players have been caught and have served lengthy suspensions, costing them huge portions of their salary. Despite their extraordinary performance on the diamond during their illustrious careers, they may never be admitted into the HOF as a result of their drug use.

Should former Yanks and other baseball players be excluded from the HOF if there is strong evidence that they used PEDs during their careers? This is a complicated question.

First, how far back should we look? As we strongly suspect, several old-timer greats are known to have used drugs. Should Gossage and others be removed from the HOF? What if players used drugs during a period when they were illegal but MLB enforcement was lax? Should they be punished? Should players who used them when they were illegal, tested positive, and were suspended be selected for the HOF or even included on HOF ballots?

Some might ask, what’s the big deal if baseball players used PEDS? Isn’t this like taking vitamin supplements, adhering to good nutrition, and using expensive exercise equipment in order to increase muscle mass and strength? And if they want to risk their future health, so what, that’s their choice. It won’t harm anyone else except them. Perhaps drugs are only being banned because they are tabu in our society.

Others, however, will argue that scientific evidence clearly shows that, in addition to providing players an unfair advantage, PEDs have serious negative health effects and must be banned. Allowing MLB players to use PEDs will encourage teenagers and college students to do the same, and such substances will likely have an adverse effect on their health as well.

This will also undermine the integrity of the game, and Americans will no longer want to attend games and watch them on television (or through other electronic devices). Aggressive testing and harsh penalties, including permanent elimination from the HOF ballot, will act as a strong deterrence for young MLB players to consume PEDs.

In my view, it is ludicrous to argue that baseball players should be allowed to use PEDs. The potential to earn more money and provide players more freedom to do as they please are distorted incentives for players to use PEDs, particularly given their well-known, long-term deleterious effects on their health. Such a policy would especially harm the youth of the country who worship MLB players and would destroy the integrity of the game.

More from Yanks Go Yard

• Aaron Judge Time interview scared Yankees as much as it scared you
• MLB Network’s proposed Yankees-White Sox trade seems insane
• Why weren’t Yankees in on Kodai Senga now that we know the price?
• There’s one way Yankees can make SF Giants’ offseason even worse
• Yankees should swing trade for old enemy to fill 2023 left field vacancy

In my opinion, those who used PEDs before they were banned should be given a pass. These players were not doing anything illegal, and we didn’t really know about the positive and negative effects of using PEDs at the time.

However, those who used PEDs after they were banned, regardless of how aggressive the MLB was in enforcing existing drug-use rules and regulation, should be barred from the HOF.

These players, such as former Yanks Rodriguez and Cano, broke the law and cheated by gaining an unfair advantage over other players on the playing field. They engaged in this act secretly, hoping they would never get caught, in order to gain an unfair advantage over other baseball players.

No doubt, the use of PEDs by certain notable ballplayers will be in the back of the minds of the baseball writers as they select players in the modern era for the 2019 HOF. The results of this vote will tell us a lot about how much the writers are willing to forgive or penalize those who used PEDs illegally during their careers.